KIM WITCZAK TESTIMONY

Comments

Comments

  1. This woman makes me want to puke to be honest. People like her only care when it directly affects their lives personally, never giving a flying-fuck about others.

    Even now, in the face of thousands deaths due to this so-called vaccine, she tries to make it about her, over the death of her husband, and the poor decision he made to take Zoloft for his trouble sleeping.

    1. THE AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS: COVID-19 AND CARE HOMES.

      The report on the United Kingdom. A passage from the report:

      Covid-19 has had a devastating impact on older persons living in care homes in England. 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England between 2 March and 12 June, with over 18,500 care home residents confirmed to have died with Covid-19 during this period. UK government decisions and failures resulted in violations of the human rights of people living in care homes, notably the right to life, to health and to non-discrimination. From discharging 25,000 patients, including those infected, into care homes; to denying care homes residents admission to hospital and imposing “do not attempt resuscitation” orders on them without due process, to failing to provide PPE (personal protective equipment) and testing to care homes. Older persons living in care homes were abandoned to die.

      I guess; “people in care homes had their right to life violated”, sounds better than; “people in care homes were murdered,” but it is less accurate.

      THE ELDERLY PEOPLE IN CARE HOMES WERE MURDERED.

      http://preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184

      1. unconscious objector… can you do nothing but copy and paste your rabbit pellets everywhere?? Find something NEW to harp on, at least.
        you’re losing you point through constant, constant, constant and constant repetition… repetition, repetition Take a nap already, you obviously need one.

    2. The fact the this person says she Kim W. is self serving exposes their own selfish flawed judgemental nature, the person with the handle “conscientious objector” has their own self serving agenda, always talking trash and never agreeing. This alleged person is probably paid by big pharma or the surveillance state to foment discord, and sow the seeds of derision This attack is so easy to see as flawed , illustrating both arrogance and a lack of intelligence. The said entity should use their real name if they what people to take their rants seriously, just seems like “the objector” is joking around, wasting their own time on what appears to be a personal vendetta,, truly this is the character of a simple mind person of child like character. Got facts to share or just hominem attacks, which lose the debate by definition, its a last resort, along with unrelated insults,, which is called a non sequitur fallacy. This and name calling, do not convince anyone, so what are you really trying to accomplish here, as you come off like a pathetic sad and miserable character? I suggest you find a good mental health consultant that understands your disposition and will help you become a more practical person.

      1. “This alleged person is probably paid by big pharma or the surveillance state to foment discord”

        Sure, Big Pharma and the U.S. government are paying me zillions to say that this is a depopulation agenda, and these are not vaccines, but death jabs.

        Me thinks you need to take your own advise and see a shrink.

        I’m just being honest with this woman, and telling her what I see, if that offends her or anyone else, there isn’t anything I can or would do about that.

        In my life, I have always appreciated people who are truthful with me, even though that truth can sometimes be painful, but I don’t expect someone like you to understand that.

        1. I 100% agree with Nat Davis! I guess you have NEVER heard the saying,
          “ you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”
          The fact that you started your comment with, “this woman makes me want to puke tbh” say volumes about the type of person you seem to be or come off as being! It brings to mind a phrase that Joyce Meyer uses all the time about people who speak as you do, that they are hard, harsh, sharp & pressing & it turns off practically everyone who hears/reads it! It also turns off a huge percentage of the population when equate motives to someone when you, one do not know her or her past, two, you have NO idea what her motives actually are, other than what she says they are & you choose to say she has an ulterior motive for speaking out & three, that you assume that she doesn’t care about all the things that you say you care about. How completely arrogant you sound in all of your comments. See it works both ways! Unfortunately many people do not wake up to the horrors of Big Pharma & the damage they inflict until it lands at their feet. Maybe you should try to show some grace
          In your comments, until you actually know what a person’s motives actually are! At least she is putting herself out there & doing something instead of hiding behind a key board & trashing her & her efforts!

          1. Okay Lisa, get it all out, throw in as many digs as you want to make yourself feel better.

            I have a long history of confronting people like her in exactly the same fashion I did when I responded to her. More often than not, those people ended up thanking me for being honest about what I saw and caring enough to say it when their initial reaction is to accuse me of attacking them.

            I think there’s a good side to Kim, but she makes a bad impression on me here, and I wouldn’t change a word to make her, or you, feel better.

            I hope she can see this covid experience as the thing that brought us all together to confront the lies of the past 100+ years, not just covid. If covid went away tomorrow, we would still be in a world of trouble.

    3. Please try to be gentle with your comments. She gave a great response and tied what’s happening now to what was in the past. And she made sure that it is on record who was not there. Most people who have fought against vaccines in the past do so after their child was injured. Our hearts go out to all people afflicted by the lies

      1. “Most people who have fought against vaccines in the past do so after their child was injured.”

        That’s a shameful point you make Dana and it’s true nonetheless. Most people don’t give a rat’s ass until the chickens come home to roost, and by then it’s often too late.

        We need to deal with the lies of the past 100 years or more, not just covid, which is only a symptom of a society that has completely lost its collective mind, and refuses to deal with reality not just on this issue, but practically every issue under the sun.

    4. Why do people continue to believe that all these adverse effects of almost everything produced by big pharma are inadvertent???
      Big pHARMa’s motives are NOT benevolent.

      1. There’s a lot of brainwashing involved, serious brainwashing, from practically the cradle to the grave. We are under several forms of attack, not just from big pharma, they are just one aspect in dozens.

        1. She got black box warnings on the labels, that’s something. Dunno how much it’s helped but it’s better than nothing. She tried to do something that would help other people. But yeah, your average person either doesn’t care or is totally ignorant until something happens to them. Very common unfortunately.

          All these people shocked at how the government is acting haven’t been paying attention for the last 40+ years. Where we’re at now is just its natural progression.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson held a panel discussion in Washington, D.C., with doctors and medical researchers who treat COVID-19 vaccine injuries, along with patients who have experienced adverse events due to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Explore

Page 1 of 1
  • EXPERIMENTING ON THE HANDICAPPED

    In a disturbing sequence, Dr. Plotkin admits to conducting vaccine experiments on babies born to incarcerated mothers, people with mental illness, and the handcapped. What is more shocking, is his defense of such experimentation.

    #TestingOnHandicapped #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath #PlotkinOnVaccines

  • COMPARING VACCINATED VS UNVACCINATED

    Dr. Stanley Plotkin is questioned under oath, about conducting a study comparing health outcomes between children receiving vaccines, and children receiving no vaccines.

    #PlotkinOnVaccines #VaxVsUnvax #DoTheStudy #Plotkin #TheHighWire #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath

  • EXPERIMENTING ON THE HANDICAPPED

    In a disturbing sequence, Dr. Plotkin admits to conducting vaccine experiments on babies born to incarcerated mothers, people with mental illness, and the handcapped. What is more shocking, is his defense of such experimentation.

    #TestingOnHandicapped #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath #PlotkinOnVaccines

  • ABORTED FETAL TISSUE IN VACCINES

    Watch Dr. Plotkin, under oath and in haunting fashion, detail his use of numerous aborted fetuses in vaccine development over the course of his career.

    #AbortedFetalTissue #Vaccines #PlotkinOnVaccines #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath

  • DO VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM?

    In a shocking admission under oath, Dr. Plotkin agrees with attorney Aaron Siri that the data is insufficient to make the claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism.’ Despite his admission, Dr. Plotkin asserts he would lie to his patients about this, in order to convince them to vaccinate.

    #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath #PlotkinOnVaccines #VaccinesAndAutism #Autism

  • WHO IS STANLEY PLOTKIN?

    Stanley Plotkin has developed or worked on vaccines going all the way back to the Polio vaccine in the 1950’s. Coined ‘The Godfather of Vaccines’, Bill Gates has referred to him as ‘one of the last remaining giants of Vaccinology’.

    #PlotkinDeposition #UnderOath #StanleyPlotkin #Plotkin #PlotkinOnVaccines