THE REAL ALEX JONES | PART 2

The HighWire presents LIVE coverage of “The People vs. Poison” rally outside the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court as the national debate over pesticides, corporate accountability, and public health reaches a critical moment.

At the center of the fight is glyphosate, the herbicide used in Roundup, as the Court considers whether federal pesticide approvals can shield corporations from lawsuits over failure to warn.

Thousands gather to march and hear a powerful lineup of speakers — elected officials from both sides of the aisle, farmers, scientists, individuals impacted by glyphosate exposure, and leaders from a broad coalition of organizations fighting for meaningful food and chemical reform.

“For decades they poisoned us for profit. Now the people are fighting back.”

Join Vani Hari, Del Bigtree, Alex Clark, Thomas Massie and many, many more…

Del is joined by Zen Honeycutt, founder and executive director of Moms Across America, ahead of the People vs. Poison rally at the U.S. Supreme Court on April 27th, where thousands will march to oppose Bayer’s bid for liability immunity from over 170,000 glyphosate cancer lawsuits. But as Zen explains, the Supreme Court is only one front in a three-branch battle. She breaks down the alarming pesticide provisions buried in the Farm Bill, including sections that would force the EPA to prioritize industry interests over public health, delay the long-overdue glyphosate endocrine-disruption review by five years, and strip states and local governments of the right to restrict pesticide use. She encourages viewers to sign up at ThePeopleVsPoison.org and join the Capitol Hill lobby day on April 28th.

Airdate: April 23, 2026

Is history repeating itself? Jefferey reveals a chilling, months-long pattern of government-issued “stay indoors” warnings spreading across America — and asks the question mainstream media refuses to: Is this really about air quality, or is it about controlling your behavior?

The EPA is pointing to PM 2.5 fine particulate matter in states including Arizona, California, and Oregon — toxins linked to cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological damage. But Jefferey digs deeper: these pollutants largely come from power plants, industries, and automobiles — so why are individuals being told to lock themselves inside instead of going after the source?

The study driving these alerts openly admits its goal is changing human behavior at scale. As Jaxen reveals, the researchers themselves ask: “How fast can we change people’s behavior?” Under the banner of climate change, fear-based messaging is being used to pressure Americans to drive less, change their diets, and comply — using the same carrot-and-stick psychology deployed during COVID lockdowns.

This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern. And you need to see it.

AIRDATE: April 9, 2026

New research and major legal battles are raising urgent questions about the safety of pesticides and herbicides used in the U.S. food supply. Hear the growing controversy surrounding chemicals like paraquat, a widely used herbicide that has been banned in more than 70 countries but is still permitted in the United States.

Facing thousands of lawsuits linking the chemical to Parkinson’s disease, manufacturer Syngenta has announced plans to stop producing paraquat, highlighting how courtroom pressure is often moving faster than regulatory action. At the same time, new scientific research is revealing alarming findings about pesticide exposure, including evidence that prenatal and early childhood exposure may cause DNA damage, epigenetic changes, immune system disruption, and developmental health risks.

Jefferey also explores a groundbreaking study suggesting that pesticide exposure could have health effects lasting across multiple generations, potentially influencing disease risk, fertility, and metabolic health for decades.

Meanwhile, controversial provisions in the proposed U.S. Farm Bill could shield pesticide manufacturers from lawsuits by limiting state-level challenges to federal pesticide labeling rules—sparking growing grassroots opposition from health advocates and environmental groups.

As debates intensify over the future of glyphosate, paraquat, and other agricultural chemicals, this discussion examines the role of regulatory agencies, scientific research, and public advocacy in shaping the safety of America’s food system.

AIRDATE: March 19, 2026

As governments and tech companies push forward with the next generation of wireless infrastructure, a critical question remains largely unanswered: Is 6G safe? Jefferey examines growing concerns surrounding radio frequency (RF) radiation, the rapid expansion of wireless networks, and the lack of modern safety testing behind current exposure limits.

Despite billions of dollars in telecom lobbying and an aggressive global race to deploy 5G and 6G networks, many of the safety standards used today were based on decades-old experiments involving only a handful of animals exposed to RF radiation for short periods of time. Critics argue that these outdated assumptions fail to account for long-term exposure from cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, smart meters, satellites, and future implantable technologies connected to wireless networks.

The conversation explores the role of regulatory agencies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the influence of industry lobbying, and the growing call for independent research into the health effects of wireless radiation. We also look at emerging policy responses, including efforts to limit cell phone exposure in schools, while some researchers warn about potential links between RF radiation exposure and issues such as DNA damage, neurological effects, and certain cancers.

As the world moves toward 6G connectivity, AI integration, and satellite-based global networks, this discussion asks whether innovation is moving faster than safety science—and why many experts believe it’s time to revisit wireless radiation standards.

AIRDATE: March 19, 2026

This week on Episode 468 of The HighWire, Jefferey Jaxen investigates the health and policy questions surrounding 6G expansion, radio frequency radiation, paraquat, glyphosate, and pesticide liability protections. As the Trump administration pushes toward next-generation wireless infrastructure, we examine claims about weak RF safety standards, industry influence, and growing concern over long-term exposure. It also breaks down the latest on paraquat lawsuits, the EPA debate, and controversial Farm Bill pesticide provisions that critics say could limit legal accountability for chemical manufacturers.

Host Del Bigtree sits down with Dr. Stuart Fischbein for an in-studio conversation on natural birth, home birth, VBACs, and the medicalization of childbirth, exploring how families can think differently about pregnancy, birth, and informed decision-making.

March 19, 2026

While global conflicts dominate headlines, a major public health story may be unfolding quietly in the U.S. Supreme Court. Del Bigtree breaks down the Trump administration’s Department of Justice decision to support Bayer/Monsanto in a critical legal case that could limit lawsuits over the weedkiller glyphosate—best known as the active ingredient in Roundup.

The case centers on whether pesticide manufacturers can be held liable for failing to warn consumers about potential cancer risks. Bayer is seeking protection from thousands of lawsuits linking glyphosate exposure to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, arguing that federal regulatory approvals should preempt state-level failure-to-warn claims.

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world and is sprayed on an estimated 80–90% of major U.S. crops, making the outcome of the case potentially significant for farmers, consumers, and the future of food safety regulation.

Supporters of Bayer argue that uniform federal labeling standards are necessary for agricultural stability, while critics warn the case could weaken corporate accountability and limit Americans’ ability to pursue legal action against pesticide manufacturers.

As the legal battle unfolds, this discussion explores the implications for glyphosate litigation, corporate liability, EPA oversight, food safety policy, and the future of regenerative agriculture in the United States.

AIRDATE: March 5, 2026

A new executive order aimed at ensuring an “adequate supply” of glyphosate-based herbicides is drawing backlash from MAHA leaders—who say it echoes the 1986 liability shield created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. They argue the move functions as a protection plan for manufacturers while limiting public recourse, and warn it could be a lobbyist-driven push to expand legal immunity for chemical companies. With public pressure now building, MAHA voices are urging viewers to mobilize—before glyphosate follows the same path vaccines did.

AIRDATE: February 26, 2026

This week on The HighWire, Del Bigtree tackles the MAHA moment head-on, starting with rising backlash over the Trump Administration’s recent action on glyphosate and concerns about expedited production tied to Roundup.

Del is joined by Vani Hari (Food Babe) to discuss what’s happening right now in food policy and reform—and what it means for families.

Plus, Jefferey Jaxen takes us deeper into the Epstein files, focusing on what’s coming to light around medical/science publishing and influence.

And in a must-see in-studio interview, Del sits down with Dr. Michael Nehls on lithium—asking whether we’ve been missing (or denying) a truly essential element.

Guests: Vani Hari, Dr. Michael Nehls

AIRDATE: February 26, 2026