The FDA has settled a court case that alleged the agency overstepped with its campaign against ivermectin. The federal agency needs to remove every post or statement they made against ivermectin. This includes the most viewed post for the FDA on the platform X, in which they state, “You’re not a horse, stop it.”

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) issued a press release regarding the settlement. Paul E Marik, M.D., was a plaintiff in the case and is the chairman and chief scientific officer of the FLCCC Alliance (FLCCC). He said, “The FDA interfered in the practice of medicine with their irresponsible language and posts about ivermectin. We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.”

Ivermectin was highly publicized at the height of the pandemic as the number one podcast host in the world, Joe Rogan, said he took the medicine while he was sick with COVID-19. That prompted many mainstream media outlets to run stories stating that Joe Rogan took a horse dewormer drug instead of getting the vaccine. Rogan even threatened to sue CNN for their framing of the story because they failed to mention that ivermectin is also formulated for human use. 

The same thing occurred with the FDA’s famous “You’re not a horse” post. Despite this heavily shared post that lacks important context, the FDA has a page titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat COVID-19“, which was last updated in December 2021, that provides this context. It says ivermectin is approved to treat “intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms.”

This page also goes on to say that the FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in the treatment of COVID-19 and that there is no evidence it is safe or effective for this purpose. This page, which speaks primarily about ivermectin as a deworming drug for livestock, must be removed within 21 calendar days of the settlement, which falls on April 11, 2024. The settlement includes all other posts that indicate ivermectin should not be used to treat COVID–19 and posts on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram making similar references to ivermectin as a drug for horses. 

In the viral ivermectin post, the FDA presented an argument with logical fallacies. The red herring logical fallacy is when a misleading argument is presented to get the public to think in a certain way. The FDA did this when they said “You’re not a horse.” This is misleading because the drug is also formulated for humans and doesn’t address whether the medicine is suitable for COVID-19. 

In the FLCCC press release, Doctor Pierre Kory stated “The FDA knew exactly what it was doing when it tweeted that ivermectin was for horses and that people should ‘stop it.’ I hope this case will serve as precedent the next time a federal health agency steps out of its authority and tries to practice medicine.”

Dr. Kory is one of the doctors who researched the use of ivermectin and prescribed it to his patients in the treatment of COVID-19. He also authored the book The War On Ivermectin and made several appearances on The HighWire discussing the topic with Del Bigtree. A short film was published in December that can be viewed here

As Dr. Kory states, it is not the job of the FDA to practice medicine. It is fine for the FDA to state that a drug has not been approved for a specific use, but it is not within the realm of the agency to advocate against the off-label usage of a drug. 20% of all prescriptions made today are for off-label usage. It is not only legal for doctors to do so, but it is also common as it allows doctors to make the best choices for each individual patient. 

The three plaintiffs in the case were doctors who said the FDA campaign against ivermectin harmed their reputations. The three doctors are Robert L. ApterMary Talley Bowden, and Paul E. Marik. These doctors used their medical knowledge to prescribe the best treatments for their patients. The FDA tried to step in the middle of the doctor/patient relationship. These doctors endured censorship and harm to their reputations as a result. 

At the same time, the Murthy v. Missouri case continues as an important legal precedent for government-encouraged censorship of social media companies, which took place at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The FDA, CDC, and federal government provided strong messaging to encourage COVID-19 vaccine uptake and made declarations against alternative treatment options such as ivermectin. A viral post indicated that the FDA receives most of its funding from the corporations it regulates. The USA Today did a fact check to find that only 45% of the funding comes from application fees for when drug makers submit their product for approval. 

The amount of funds received by the FDA from the user fees increased by 42% between fiscal years 2017 and 2021. While USA Today rated the claim as mostly false, it upheld the truth that a large amount of funding to the FDA comes directly from the corporations they are regulating. Furthermore, a HighWire report from November went into more detail regarding the revolving door between the FDA and pharmaceutical companies, including Moderna. 

Regarding the outcome, Dr. Bowden stated, “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

Photo credit: https://twitter.com/mdbreathe/status/1771023714584273015?s=46&t=2tCbfuj36dolslMYQjC7Rg

 

 

Steven Middendorp

Steven Middendorp is an investigative journalist, musician, and teacher. He has been a freelance writer and journalist for over 20 years. More recently, he has focused on issues dealing with corruption and negligence in the judicial system. He is a homesteading hobby farmer who encourages people to grow their own food, eat locally, and care for the land that provides sustenance to the community.

Other Headlines

Coronavirus

Subpoena Uncovers COVID-19 Email Secrets Amid Whistleblower Allegations

A subpoena has been issued to Dr. David Morens to provide copies of emails related to COVID-19 from his personal account as part of the investigation by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. During the pandemic, Dr. Morens worked closely with Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Committee Chairman Brad Wenstrup announced the subpoenaContinue reading Subpoena Uncovers COVID-19 Email Secrets Amid Whistleblower Allegations

More news about Coronavirus

Health & Nutrition

Study Shows 98% Of Children Grow Out of Gender Confusion by Adulthood

A new study concludes that 98% of gender-confused children grow out of it and will become comfortable with the gender that corresponds to their birth sex by the time they reach adulthood. The age with the highest rate of gender confusion is the age of 11, which is just before the typical onset of puberty.  TheContinue reading Study Shows 98% Of Children Grow Out of Gender Confusion by Adulthood

More news about Health & Nutrition

Vaccines

Entries Within V-Safe Data Release Raise Eyebrows

The first batch of free-text V-safe data was released on February 15th, after a court victory. With 390,000 free text entries, it is time-consuming to browse and find the most revealing details. There was one comment that said “death,” and another said, “died.” There were several results for “miscarriage,” while a few more comments mentionedContinue reading Entries Within V-Safe Data Release Raise Eyebrows

More news about Vaccines

Science & Tech

USDA Reopens Comment Period for Deregulation of Gene-Edited Plants

The deregulation of gene-edited plants is on the USDA agenda, and the public comment period has been extended by 21 days. The comment page has yet to be posted on the Federal Register. CRISPR is a new technology that is being used in agriculture to modify plants. “New Gene Technologies” or NGTs are how big agricultural companies like Bayer areContinue reading USDA Reopens Comment Period for Deregulation of Gene-Edited Plants

More news about Science & Tech

Environment

Unpacking the Global Health Security Strategy: Surveillance, Sustainability, and “One Health” Approach

President Joe Biden announced the release of a  U.S. Global Health Security Strategy (GHSS). The synopsis of the new plan states, “The new Global Health Security Strategy articulates a whole-of-government, science-based approach to strengthening global health security.” The plan is further explained as a necessary approach to mitigate harm from future pandemics while partnering with 50 countries.  In the aftermathContinue reading Unpacking the Global Health Security Strategy: Surveillance, Sustainability, and “One Health” Approach

More news about Environment

Policy

First Amendment Under Fire: Lawmakers and Journalists Speak Out at Capitol Hill Hearing

Freedom of the press is established in the First Amendment of the Constitution, but government surveillance of journalists continues to threaten that constitutional right more than 230 years later. That was the topic of a House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing regarding the Press Act (Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying) that would establish further protections forContinue reading First Amendment Under Fire: Lawmakers and Journalists Speak Out at Capitol Hill Hearing

More news about Policy