Although the Big Pharma-funded mainstream media chose not to broadcast this critical information, a recent peer-reviewed study of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 shot should be of concern to everyone. Published December 3, 2024, in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law—a journal founded in 2020 that aims to disseminate objective and ethically conducted studies and other scientific publications following rigorous peer review—the eye-opening article concludes that there are “grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine.” The three German study authors maintain that the results of their analysis “call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” The authors wrote:

“Already before the start of the governmental vaccination campaign, physicians and scientists pointed out that serious adverse events would be triggered by the gene-based agents. In the meantime, the spectrum of adverse events has become so multi-faceted that the term “spikeopathy” has been created to denote the new disease complex.”

The three authors, Ulrike Kämmerer, Verena Schultz, and Klaus Steger, note that the eternal dangers of all RNA biologicals are 4-fold. They explain that first, modRNA encoding any foreign protein will trigger harmful autoimmune reactions. Second, the lipid nanoparticles are themselves highly toxic. Third, residual plasmid-DNA and reverse-transcribed mRNA—far exceeding the maximum acceptable concentration set by international regulatory authorities—will genetically modify cells. Fourth, replacing uridine in natural mRNA with N1-methyl-pseudouridine in synthetic modRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting, resulting in the haphazard production of utterly alien proteins.

Why would any free-thinking human being knowingly want “the haphazard production of utterly alien proteins” to occur in their body? The study highlights ongoing concerns about the dangerous mRNA technology, which undoubtedly includes the risks of excess DNA integration into human cells contributing to genomic instability (which occurs when a cell’s DNA becomes easily damaged or changes frequently), debilitating unintended immune responses, and long-term adverse health events that, to this day, have not been studied.

As noted by The Vaccine Reaction, genomic instability can lead to health issues such as cancer because the cell’s instructions are distorted in the genetic code. Simply put, the cell’s “genetic blueprint” is unstable and is thus more likely to develop dangerous “errors”—or mutations—over time. This significant cell malfunction is a severe issue and should prompt immediate further analysis. The study found that gene analyses with selected PCR primer pairs demonstrated that residual DNA represents not only fragments of the DNA matrices coding for the spike gene but of all genes from the plasmid, including the SV40 promoter/enhancer (Simian Virus 40) and the antibiotic resistance gene.

Last December, Florida’s State Surgeon General, Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, raised critical concerns about the safety assessments and the discovery of numerous DNA fragments per dose in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA injections, as published in an October 19, 2023 study. In typical FDA fashion, the agency responded that the “ongoing proliferation of misinformation and disinformation about these vaccines, which results in vaccine hesitancy that lowers vaccine uptake,” could cost lives. Ladapo ‘s main issue with the jabs revolved around the existence of nucleic acid contaminants in the FDA-approved shots. As is undoubtedly well known, the “vaccines” use lipid nanoparticles to deliver mRNA into human cells. Highlighting Ladapo’s concerns over DNA contaminants, Infection Control Today remarked:

“There’s growing apprehension that these nanoparticles may also facilitate the transmission of contaminant DNA into human cells. Additionally, the vaccines contain Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoter/enhancer DNA, which raises the potential risk of DNA integration into human cells.”

The October 2023 study, which noted the fragments found in the mRNA jabs, stated, “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of 62 DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines.… With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic 71 conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection 72 and cumulative dosing.” After all, in 2007, the FDA issued its nonbinding guidance titled “Considerations for Plasmid DNA Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications.” This guidance emphasized the need to evaluate the risks of DNA integration in vaccines employing untried delivery methods. In particular, it pointed to the theoretical risk of DNA integration impacting oncogenes, which could result in the transformation of normal cells into cancerous ones and the possibility of chromosomal instability.

A study in the Winter 2024 edition of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons submits what many have said for years: that the experimental mRNA COVID-19 jabs should have never been classified as vaccines. The study explains that the recent rise of mRNA technology has resulted in a breakdown of the regulatory framework, where even definitions are vague. The study authors, which include Peter McCullough, MD, who also serves on the Editorial Board of Science, Public Health Policy, & the Law, offer an example, stating, “the COVID-19 modRNA vaccines are not classified as gene therapy products, whereas an mRNA vaccine against a non-infectious disease such as cancer is not classified as a vaccine, but as a gene therapy product.”

Enough is enough. The strategy of not following the rules and changing the definition to fit the narrative must end.