We're sharpening our digital tools!Introducing our sleek and powerful new video player for an even better viewing experience.Share your thoughts!

Episode 288: JUSTICE FOR ALL



  1. Del, I would definitely love to help and be involved in any lawsuits for states that have removed the religious exemption. Can’t wait to hear more about it.

  2. A report that needs to be produced is to compare v-safe data with VAERS data and sift out those people from V-safe who did not report to VAERS. This way we have a wider picture of the amount of people not reporting to VAERS. (at least from those 10,000,000 reporting to V-safe)

  3. If V-safe is off from 10M people is reporting 20% of those with adverse effects -min the millions…. and VAERS’s reports is only 527,000 from an unknown number which is supposed to be more than 10M … it is clear that VAERS is not reflecting the true number of adverse effects from the whole community of vaccinated!!!

  4. Once again another huge & enlightening episode. Thank you for Giving people the facts from which to develop their own stance.
    Really appreciate the integrity of this journalism.

  5. Sorry, but I find the V-Safe information very misleading.
    I’m glad ICAN was able to obtain the information, however it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise that if legitimately serious adverse reactions were as common as this presentation is making them out to be, then none of those parents would have given their child a jab as well because if we’re talking somewhere between one in four and one in ten, then every adult would personally know someone seriously affected.

    One of the categories was time off work… I have to ask, how many employees were paid or rewarded through government incentive or workplace incentive to to have a day or two off work if/when they got the jab? And in doing so, did they then tick the “time off work” box?
    I’m not trying to defend the jab because all vaccines are poison and these ones are no doubt the worst ever. I’m just trying to be thorough and honest and not misleading, as that ruins credibility and trust.

    The fact is, the data presented shows that “serious” events included numerous mild reactions and pretty much zero actual serious reactions. Anybody who presents this information as a means of proving the dangers of the Covid jabs will be laughed at by anybody paying attention.

    Nonetheless, keep up the excellent work in the fight for free choice, free speech, etc. as that is all that really matters.

    1. I agree, there are a lot of assumptions even in what was presented – I doubt if we’ll ever know the truth, even when we get the ‘other’ box information. will always be ‘as clear as mud’ really…

  6. Reality cannot be ignored except at a price; and the longer the ignorance is persisted in, the higher and the more terrible becomes the price that must be paid.

    – Aldous Huxley

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply
Episode 288: JUSTICE FOR ALL

‘Died Suddenly News’ Creator Winning Censorship War; FDA Autopsy Cover Up?; Wuhan Theory Reignites; ICAN’s New V-safe Dashboard

Guests: Tiago Henriques, Aaron Siri, Esq.