Need to consider relevance and conclusions drawn from Walgreens data It’s not unreasonable to believe that the sampling of community is not truly random. It’s very possible that there are many more people that are getting tested for Covid at Walgreens that have been previously vaccinated. than have not been vaccinated. They are more prone to infection and maybe more paranoid. I don’t really know but that would severely affect what’s really going on as far as whether vaccines actually are causing anincrease in infections.
the Walgreens chart also may have a big fat hopeful in there. Look at how the infection rate drops to 20,2 and 20,8 if the jabs have been given more than 5 months ago! They do possibly really wear off!!!
Need to consider relevance and conclusions drawn from Walgreens data It’s not unreasonable to believe that the sampling of community is not truly random. It’s very possible that there are many more people that are getting tested for Covid at Walgreens that have been previously vaccinated. than have not been vaccinated. They are more prone to infection and maybe more paranoid. I don’t really know but that would severely affect what’s really going on as far as whether vaccines actually are causing anincrease in infections.
the Walgreens chart also may have a big fat hopeful in there. Look at how the infection rate drops to 20,2 and 20,8 if the jabs have been given more than 5 months ago! They do possibly really wear off!!!