A newly published comprehensive qualitative risk assessment of vaping concluded that smoking vapes “are likely to be carcinogenic to humans… causing an indeterminate burden of oral cancer and lung cancer.” Lead author Bernard Stewart also wrote an article for The Conversation and said this is the strongest evidence that vaping likely causes cancer. Stewart explained that it took 100 years for researchers to definitively prove that smoking tobacco causes cancer.

Most of the research into the harms of vaping has evaluated the likelihood that the activity would serve as a gateway to smoking tobacco, which has been considered to be a greater threat of cancer. However, there have been no long-term studies evaluating cancer risk for people who vape alone.

Stewart explained that the aerosol from vaping devices demonstrates all 10 key characteristics of carcinogens identified by the World Health Organization (WHO). He described it as a “complex range of chemicals, including nicotine and its byproducts.”

There has been a known link between cancer and cigarette smoking since the 1950s and rates have steadily declined from over 40% in 1965 to 11% in 2022.

“Physiological evidence of exposure using biomarkers reveals DNA damage correlated with vape-derived metabolites attributable to carcinogens including nicotine-derived nitrosamines, volatile organic compounds, flavour-derived agents, and certain metals,” the study authors wrote. “Biomarkers also indicate vaping-attributable oxidative stress, epigenetic change and inflammation in oral and respiratory tissue often specified in comparison with smoking.”

E-cigarettes and vapes have long been considered a less harmful alternative to smoking cigarettes or a potential cessation strategy for people who are addicted to nicotine. In recent years, the perception has changed greatly and many people have started to believe that vaping is more harmful – a belief that UT Southwestern researchers say is false after conducting a recent study. 

“The perception that e-cigarettes are more harmful than cigarettes has been linked to both a decreased willingness to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and an increased likelihood of switching from vaping to smoking. Understanding the ramifications of this perception change represents a critical consideration when developing cessation strategies,” said co-author David Gerber, M.D.

Researchers are suggesting the public should understand the nuance when discussing the risks of vaping. Stewart’s research finds that the product is likely to cause cancer, but Gerber and co-authors stress that it is still less harmful than smoking cigarettes and can be a useful tool for adults who are looking to quit smoking cigarettes.

“Our findings show the need to strike a balance in public health messaging that discourages youths from using either product while also ensuring that adults who do smoke have access to accurate information about product risks and cessation options,” co-author Dr. Cristina Thomas said.

Dependence on vaping is still very prevalent, and it is more socially acceptable among teens and young adults than smoking cigarettes. A 2021 literature review came to three important differences between dependence as it relates to smoking cigarettes and vaping. There is greater variability in vaping products, vaping can be done more discreetly, and it is more socially acceptable among youth. The authors of the 2021 review suggest there is an “urgent need” for effective vaping cessation interventions for youth.

The latest research by Stewart and co-researchers suggests vaping is likely to cause cancer, but he says there needs to be large and careful studies to determine causality and prevalence. Other researchers are concerned that worries about the harms associated with vaping will prevent adults from utilizing it as a cessation tool. However, the social acceptability and discretion of vaping make it a threat to teenagers who can more easily become addicted to nicotine.

In addition to these concerns, the amount of nicotine in a vape cartridge has increased substantially over time. In about 10 years, the amount of nicotine in some cartridges has increased 30-fold. It was once equivalent to the amount of nicotine in a pack of cigarettes, but now a cartridge can contain the equivalent of 30 packs of cigarettes, or three cartons.

135-150 puffs a day is considered normal for daily e-cigarette users. 200-500 puffs is considered “moderate use.” A 2021 study evaluated nicotine levels in Juul pods and determined that 200 puffs is equal to 13-30 cigarettes. The peak of the teen vaping trend was around 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, when about one-third of teens were vaping. In 2024, about 1.6 million teens were using vapes.

HHS released a teen vaping guide in September to explain the harms associated with the product on teen brains, including potential impacts on attention, learning, mood, and impulse control. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary was also taking steps to crack down on an illicit vaping market that was providing illegal “gamified” vaping products from China that are designed to get teens to use the product more frequently.

Steven Middendorp

Steven Middendorp is an investigative journalist, musician, and teacher. He has been a freelance writer and journalist for over 20 years. More recently, he has focused on issues dealing with corruption and negligence in the judicial system. He is a homesteading hobby farmer who encourages people to grow their own food, eat locally, and care for the land that provides sustenance to the community.

Other Headlines

Coronavirus

No Duty of Care: Ontario Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over 17-Year-Old’s Death 33 Days After COVID Vaccine

The Ontario Court of Appeals has dismissed the case of Dan Hartman, who sued federal Canadian government officials following the death of his 17-year-old son Sean, who died 33 days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine as a requirement to participate in hockey. The lawsuit alleged the Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Health,Continue reading No Duty of Care: Ontario Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over 17-Year-Old’s Death 33 Days After COVID Vaccine

More news about Coronavirus

Health & Nutrition

Billions Spent, Root Causes Ignored: New Review Challenges the Modern Approach to Cancer

A narrative review published in the Annals of Research in Oncology concludes that the American health care system overspends on cancer research and treatments while failing to consider alternative treatments that could be more effective and cost-efficient. The authors suggest that ultra-processed food, environmental toxins, disrupted microbiomes, chronic stress, and metabolic dysfunction are the primaryContinue reading Billions Spent, Root Causes Ignored: New Review Challenges the Modern Approach to Cancer

More news about Health & Nutrition

Vaccines

No Duty of Care: Ontario Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over 17-Year-Old’s Death 33 Days After COVID Vaccine

The Ontario Court of Appeals has dismissed the case of Dan Hartman, who sued federal Canadian government officials following the death of his 17-year-old son Sean, who died 33 days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine as a requirement to participate in hockey. The lawsuit alleged the Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Health,Continue reading No Duty of Care: Ontario Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over 17-Year-Old’s Death 33 Days After COVID Vaccine

More news about Vaccines

Science & Tech

Anthropic Unauthorized Access Investigation Raises Questions About AI Safety Amidst Rapid Development

Anthropic is investigating a reported security breach that allowed a small group of people to gain access to Claude Mythos Preview, the company’s AI software that is too powerful to release to the public. AI models are becoming increasingly capable, and the 2026 International AI Safety Report notes that some hypothetical scenarios pose risks asContinue reading Anthropic Unauthorized Access Investigation Raises Questions About AI Safety Amidst Rapid Development

More news about Science & Tech

Environment

Supreme Court Considers Granting Bayer Protection From Pesticide ‘Failure-To-Warn’ Lawsuits

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday about whether Bayer can be held liable for state-level failure to warn claims when the company followed EPA labeling guidelines after the federal agency classified glyphosate as “not likely carcinogenic to humans.” The court is not considering the underlying safety profile of glyphosate or Roundup, but theContinue reading Supreme Court Considers Granting Bayer Protection From Pesticide ‘Failure-To-Warn’ Lawsuits

More news about Environment

Policy

Supreme Court Considers Granting Bayer Protection From Pesticide ‘Failure-To-Warn’ Lawsuits

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday about whether Bayer can be held liable for state-level failure to warn claims when the company followed EPA labeling guidelines after the federal agency classified glyphosate as “not likely carcinogenic to humans.” The court is not considering the underlying safety profile of glyphosate or Roundup, but theContinue reading Supreme Court Considers Granting Bayer Protection From Pesticide ‘Failure-To-Warn’ Lawsuits

More news about Policy