The Weaponization of “Quack”: Silencing Dissent in Modern Medicine
Updated
At its simplest, the word “quack” is a slur that means someone who pretends to have medical skill or knowledge that they don’t actually possess. Merriam-Webster states that a quack is “A pretender to medical skill; one who falsely claims to have knowledge of medicine or to be able to cure a disease.” In today’s profit-driven healthcare climate, it is a convenient and often-used label to discredit, delegitimize, and silence good doctors who dare to think critically, speak honestly, and treat patients as sovereign beings with the right to informed consent.
The term “quack” comes from the 17th-century Dutch word quacksalver, which was someone who peddled ointments that often claimed to boast miracle cures. Back in the day, it referred to peddlers of dubious potions scouring crowded marketplaces. Imagine charlatans hawking miracle cures from carts, shouting over the crowd, professing promises of curing a plethora of ailments. No doubt, the word quack conjures up images of snake oil salesmen and sleight of hand, not science, patient care, and sincerity.
But that is not the intent of how the term is used today.
In the 1960s, armed with its Committee on Quackery (CoQ), the American Medical Association (AMA) led a covert campaign to eliminate the chiropractic profession, calling them quacks. Yet, a threat to their wallet is more accurate. Currently, “quack” is effortlessly used to describe any doctor who refuses to bow to the consensus of corporate medicine or Big Pharma. It does not matter how educated, experienced, or committed the caregiver is to ethics and the Hippocratic Oath. The use of the term “quack” is quite literally a weapon, not an accurate descriptor of the person it is used upon. And in this post-COVID era, where dissent is dangerous and Big Pharma is the overlord, we have witnessed some of the most principled voices in modern-day medicine get dragged through the mud under that label.
For example, look at what the medical industrial complex did to Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Peter McCullough, and Dr. Paul Marik during the pandemic. Each of these professionals—and there are many others—is a highly credentialed physician with decades of clinical experience. Yet, they were suddenly branded as fringe lunatics, or “quacks” for daring to question the tyrannical COVID-19 protocols and offering treatment options outside of the planned CDC script that pushed an experimental gene-damaging technology.
Likewise, think about how Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor, was smeared for co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration, which dared to suggest focused protection instead of blanket and destructive lockdowns. Likewise, any doctor who questioned the speed, necessity, or safety of the deadly mRNA rollout was swiftly sidelined, censored, and labeled an “anti-vax quack.” Yet, in today’s world, these professionals aren’t quacks. These are doctors who still remember the Hippocratic oath. They are doctors who listen, who observe, and who treat the patient in front of them, not a pharmaceutical sales chart.
Meanwhile, the real quacks—the ones pushing one-size-fits-all, risk-free illusions backed by zero liability—are rarely called out. The revolving door between regulatory bodies and pharma giants spins without pause because the Big Pharma-funded mainstream media amplifies only one message. And any whisper of alternative thought is drowned in the chorus of “trust the science”—as if science were a creed, not a process. It is time we call this what it truly is: linguistic warfare.
The term “quack” has become a tool of suppression, not protection. Today’s version is not defined by a lack of credentials or by pushing a fake product. Instead, the term is frantically used by an increasingly obvious corrupt elite to protect and preserve a greed-driven industry, not to protect unknowing patients. In other words, it is used to insulate billion-dollar programs from scrutiny, not to weed out the bad actors desperately trying to keep us sick. And worst of all, the term is used to strong-arm good doctors into silence. After all, who wants to risk their license, their reputation, or their livelihood for speaking truth into a crooked system that has determined the debate is over?
What makes this even more insidious is that many of the doctors being labeled as quacks today are precisely the ones who took the time to sit with their patients, listen to their reactions, and respond humanely. Like the finally vindicated Dr. Andrew Wakefield, they didn’t dismiss concerns or shrug off injuries. They asked logical questions, which, in today’s corrupt climate, is the greatest heresy of all. Undoubtedly, words shape reality. When a good doctor is called a “quack” in today’s illness-driven healthcare landscape, the intent is to send a loud message—not just to their colleagues, but to every patient, parent, and citizen watching. As became evident during the pandemic, the message is clear: trust only the script, don’t question, don’t research, and avoid the “quacks.” Simply put, do as we say and comply.
But the tide is turning.
The COVID-19 era revealed too much of the dark side. We witnessed the silencing, the coordinated media takedowns, the tech censorship, and the blatant ghosting of genuine scientific debate. We witnessed firsthand the devastation that ensues when medicine is no longer a sacred covenant but instead a wicked political tool. Indeed, many of us now see clearly that the word “quack” no longer means what it used to.
In a world upside-down, perhaps the real quackery is not the obvious misuse of words to manipulate society, but the blind allegiance of those who push a false narrative. Indeed, the true quacks are the doctors who never question, who never doubt, who ignore their patients in favor of a mandate or a kickback from Big Pharma. In reality, the ones labeled as quacks are the very ones we need most. Undoubtedly, those screaming “quack” the loudest post-COVID are the ones peddling the true snake oil of today—only their potion comes shrouded in credentials, manipulated consensus, and deep-state connected corporate funding.
Hallelujah! The time has finally come to reclaim the word quack. Because in an era where speaking the truth is revolutionary, the so-called falsely labeled quacks are absolutely the ones brave enough to do what medicine was always meant to do. Yes, that means to protect the patient above all else.
