Stays in the Arm? Try the Placenta, Semen, and Blood—New Study Destroys the Myth
Updated
A groundbreaking new study has once again confirmed what many have been constantly repeating for years. Indeed, dispelling one of the more confidently repeated falsehoods in recent history, this peer-reviewed study—yes, peer-reviewed for those who like to pretend nothing counts unless it’s in their echo chamber of choice—has confirmed that the mRNA from the dangerous COVID-19 injections does not “stay in the arm” and degrade within hours. No indeed. Instead, the study revealed that not only does the mRNA not degrade quickly, but it also survives in the bodies of those injected for over 200 days. But wait, there’s more. Not only does it not stay at the injection site, but it also moves into the bloodstream, the placenta, and the sperm. And, even worse, through shedding, it has contaminated people who didn’t even take the shot.
Specifically, as noted by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH in Focal Points, the study, published in Annals of Case Reports titled, ‘Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen,’ discovered the following:
-88% of vaccinated pregnant women had detectable Pfizer mRNA in both blood and placental tissue, even when vaccinated up to 100 days before delivery. Some placentas still had mRNA up to 251 days later.
-All vaccinated men who produced sperm had vaccine mRNA in their sperm. Half had it in their seminal fluid. One was 168 days post-shot.
-The most jaw-dropping of all? Pfizer mRNA was found in 50% of unvaccinated pregnant women. Yes, you read that right. Unvaccinated pregnant women. Two had it in both blood and placenta. One had it in blood alone. The study doesn’t make claims about how that happened—it simply reports what was there. The phrase they used was, “The source of this RNA has yet to be investigated.” Translation: we might be dealing with shedding, a concept long ridiculed as conspiracy, now casually strolling into peer-reviewed literature.
To conduct the study, researchers from Bar-Ilan University and several Israeli medical centers used a technique called nested PCR with Sanger sequencing. This method used nested PCR (two rounds of targeted amplification) followed by Sanger sequencing. Then, they only counted results that hit in three out of four repeats. In this process, the researchers read the RNA sequence letter by letter to test 34 human samples: 22 pregnant women, four male sperm donors, and eight other adults.
The results completely destroy the long-held narrative that the experimental mRNA shot degrades rapidly and stays localized at the injection site. It also reinforces the widely held opinion that the public was intentionally fed a frightening propaganda tale to secure compliance. And now, with real data showing long-term presence of dangerous synthetic mRNA in reproductive and fetal tissues, we’re left holding a bag of consequences that are just beginning to surface.
The results of this study also begin to explain the wreckage we are witnessing, such as spikes in neonatal mortality, excess deaths in young people, and fertility anomalies. Each of these data points was either ignored or blamed on everything except the one common denominator that was injected into billions of arms. If ever there was a moment for humility from the likes of Anthony Fauci, this is it. But let’s not hold our breath. At the very least, this study should once and for all lead to an immediate halt in mRNA vaccine mandates, especially for pregnant women, children, and anyone planning to have kids in the next two decades. Pretending this data doesn’t exist is no longer an option.
Undoubtedly, science is not supposed to be a PR crusade. It’s supposed to be a process of discovery and correction, and this study does just that. But of course, as we know all too well, it is never that easy. As the Trump administration finally shows practical concern about the safety and effectiveness of mRNA “vaccines” (going so far as ending research funding on 22 mRNA-related projects), there are many still professing the wonders of mRNA.
Conveniently, in an effort to surely overshadow the revelations of this recent study, a different study just surfaced—like they always do—to paint mRNA jabs in a glorious light. Titled “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and 4-Year All-Cause Mortality Among Adults Aged 18 to 59 Years in France,” the study (whose authors have promoted the mRNA jabs throughout the pandemic) declares that, during the pandemic, not only did mRNA vaccines not cause damage and death, but they even reduced deaths and saved lives compared to the unvaccinated. What? We know all too well, this is not true. Thank God for Steve Kirsch, a sound voice of reason, who quickly called out the study, stating on X:
“This study is HORRIBLE. They can’t do 1:1 matching in that French data; prohibited by law. So they found a 25% NCACM reduction. In short, vaccines reduced your all-cause, non-COVID risk of death by 25%.
If that were true, the drug companies would promote [them] as life extenders!”
Thank you, Mr. Kirsch. Indeed, the study proving the biodistribution of mRNA throughout the body (including shedding) shatters the myth that the mRNA platform is inherently safe. Likewise, it confirms what many of us have been warning for years—that these products, which were rushed to market under emergency use authorizations, lacked safety studies, and were falsely marketed as “safe and effective” in the absence of such. The silence or dismissal from mainstream institutions regarding this massive experiment on humanity in response to studies such as this only deepens the moral rupture taking place regarding our health vs Big Pharma profit.
