Infant Hepatitis B Vaccine: Medicine’s Silent Scandal

The Hepatitis B vaccine has been presented to the public as an unquestionable good—a shield against disease, an emblem of public health progress. Yet beneath this official narrative lies a tale not of triumph, but of coercion, negligence, and betrayal. For decades, newborn infants—hours old, with no capacity for exposure—have been subjected to a medical intervention designed for high-risk adults. The record reveals a chilling truth: the Hepatitis B vaccine is not a story of science serving humanity, but of humanity—infants beginning life—sacrificed for policy, profit, and control. Indeed, human suffering hidden beneath the facade of “public health.”

From the very beginning, the mass administration of the Hep-B shot to newborns has been riddled with contradictions. Why? Because Hep B is a disease primarily transmitted through sexual contact, contaminated needles, and high-risk adult behaviors. Yet, it is the one vaccine forced into the bloodstream of every infant within hours of birth—when the risk of natural exposure is nearly nonexistent. Adding to the disbelief is the fact that the Hep-B vaccine was licensed by the FDA based on “147 healthy infants and children … who were monitored for 5 days after each dose.”

Here are just a few of the many studies finding serious harm from HepB vaccines ignored by the CDC in today’s presentation:

“Engerix B vaccine [given to babies in the U.S. at birth] appears to increase this risk [of CNS inflammatory demyelination in childhood], particularly for…

— Aaron Siri (@AaronSiriSG) September 18, 2025

The justification for the Hep-B jab at birth has always been flimsy. As pointed out in depth by A Midwestern Doctor, the official narratives justifying its use claim universal infant vaccination prevents chronic hepatitis, but decades of data show no such reduction. The policy to inject newborns with the vaccine never arose from a medical need for infants, but from convenience and no doubt greed: capturing the entire population in one sweep, regardless of individual risk. It is medicine deployed as control, not genuine care.

Evidence of harm has trailed the Hep-B vaccine since its inception, with researchers warning as early as the 1970s that its structure could generate autoimmune disease. By the 1990s, patterns of devastating injuries—neurological collapse, demyelinating disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, seizures, even infant deaths—were reported worldwide. Congressional hearings, lawsuits, and even France’s suspension of the program in schools all exposed the massive scale of the damage. Yet, each time, the warnings were buried under industry denial and government silence.

Not surprisingly—and like any act of deceit—the scandal deepens in the methods of the cover-up. Clinical trials on the vaccine were intentionally short, lasting mere days, ensuring that any long-term complications never had a chance to surface, and thus would never be recorded. Akin to the deadly mRNA jabs, adverse reactions, even infant deaths, were systematically dismissed or unreported. And—in what is undoubtedly a crime—parents were seldom told the complete risk profile of the Hep-B jab, and when they refused it, many were coerced and threatened with social service interventions if they dared to protect their newborns. In other words, informed consent, the cornerstone of ethical medicine, was no longer informed; it was forced. In the most vulnerable of all medical scenarios—the delivery room—mothers and fathers were pressured to comply at the very moment they were least capable of resisting. Likewise, doctors who raised concerns faced professional ostracism. Sound familiar?

The government health agency that enabled this enormous scandal is built on conflicts of interest. Finally coming into full view, the story is clear. Big Pharma funds the regulatory bodies, underwrites scientific conferences, and lobbies legislators. Officials revolve between industry and government, carrying policies and loyalties with them. The result is a dangerous alliance in which safety concerns are minimized, disagreement is discredited, and the demand grows unchecked.

3 HEP B V*CCINE: FIVE DAYS OF SAFETY TESTING?

Hepatitis B V*ccine, in the U.S., is given to healthy newborn babies on their first day of life, and it was only tested for safety for 5 days in trials. #PlotkinOnVaccines #Hepatitis #HepB pic.twitter.com/DFSbKArSQW

— The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) August 22, 2023

Indeed, the Hepatitis B vaccine has become one of the most profitable inoculations of its time—not because it was needed, but because it was mandated. Its universal application turned every infant into a customer, every parent into a captive market. The cost was borne not by the companies but by the children who paid with their health and sometimes their lives. Families have shared stories of infants who suffered seizures hours after vaccination, toddlers who regressed into chronic illness, and young people disabled by autoimmune collapse. Their testimonies are not isolated—they are echoes in a global chorus of harm. And yet, they are met with silence, gaslighting, or outright denial.

These devastating outcomes are not the unavoidable collateral of medical progress. Instead, they are the consequence of deliberate negligence—the willful ignoring of risk, the systemic suppression of truth, and the ruthless choice to prioritize profit over protection. As recently pointed out by attorney Aaron Siri, without knowing the true safety profile of the Hep-B vaccine, the CDC cannot claim that the benefits outweigh the risks of the product. Period.

The dreadful history of the Hep-B vaccine demands more than retrospective regret. It demands absolute accountability. It demands that the voices of the harmed be heard and believed. And it demands that we ask the hardest questions. Such as—how many more programs of mass intervention have been shaped not by necessity, but by convenience and greed? How many more children must bear the cost of silence?

Until these questions are answered, the Hepatitis B vaccine will remain not a symbol of protection, but a warning—a case study in what happens when medicine forgets its first principle: to do no harm.