The most explosive timeline for the mRNA COVID jabs is the one documented by our very own government. And it is far more telling than any conspiracy theory out there. One must simply look at what happened on February 28, 2021, when Israel’s Ministry of Health contacted the CDC to report a flood of myocarditis among young recipients of the Pfizer jab, to spot the scheme. Again, health officials in the United States had that critical intelligence in their hands in late February, when barely one in four adults had gotten the shot. That’s right, roughly 24% of adults in the US had received at least one dose, and only about 12.6% were fully vaccinated. Nonetheless, what the government did with that intelligence over the next three months is enough to make anyone think twice about believing that those agencies serve to protect all Americans from health, safety, and security threats, both foreign and domestic.

We know the government ignored warning signs about the dangerous mRNA jabs because a Senate subcommittee subpoenaed the records and published them in a May report titled Failure to Warn. The emails revealed via the subpoena highlight the unbelievable events and give substance to the report’s title. Failure to Warn, indeed. Through March and April, government health agencies received more reports of injury from Israel, from the Department of Defense, and from the government’s own databases. By mid-May, officials at the CDC were drafting a Health Alert Network (HAN) notice, the formal, high-profile way the agency warns doctors nationwide about a problem. A HAN draft was written, reviewed by leadership on May 23, and then, on May 27, the FDA declined to agree to send it out. What? The important alert that would have warned doctors of the myocarditis signal was never issued. Instead of the proper HAN warning, the CDC updated some softer-hitting “clinical considerations” on its website and released talking points calling the potential condition rare, mild, and self-limiting.

But that’s not all that happened during those two weeks in May 2021 to increase the likelihood of harm from the experimental jabs. On May 10, the FDA cleared Pfizer’s jab for children aged 12 to 15, and two days later, the CDC recommended it. Think about it. As the myocarditis HAN alert sat unsent by the CDC, the government actively pushed the jabs to adolescent boys, the single group the Israeli signal warned about. And just like that, the jab rollout in America forged ahead. Adult first-dose coverage climbed from roughly a quarter of adults at the end of February to more than half by late May, and by mid-July, a third of 12- to 15-year-olds had received at least one shot. Knowing that the agency stuck the warning in a drawer, unsent, while it watched needles go into the arms of those most vulnerable to the confirmed safety signal is terrifying.

But, as we all know, it gets worse. The same day that the formal HAN alert was killed, a CDC official emailed the draft of the softer-hitting website language about myocarditis to staff members at Pfizer and a consultant for Moderna. So the manufacturers of the mRNA jabs got a preview of the subdued warning before the public did. Is it normal for the companies selling the product to see the government’s safety language before the public does?

While unbelievable, none of this reached daylight by accident. Credit goes to the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) for doing such an awesome job of putting matters into the open. In particular, their attorney, Aaron Siri, has devoted years to litigation against the CDC to force it to turn over the raw safety data the agency was keen to keep from public view.  Most especially, from the American people it is supposed to protect. One of the most revealing horrors ICAN uncovered was the design of V-safe, the CDC’s own smartphone tool for tracking adverse reactions to the COVID jabs. Before its launch, the agency’s protocol listed conditions to watch for, including myocarditis and pericarditis. Yet when the app went live, none of those conditions were given a checkbox, meaning that if someone suffered heart inflammation, they had to hand-type it into a short free-text box that the CDC then refused to release. Whatever the intent, the app’s design failed to collect the very injuries the agency had already flagged. Instead, it collected headaches and chills. A federal judge eventually forced the release of 7.8 million of those entries kept under wraps. The Highwire has covered this fight from the start, and the documents came out of ICAN’s litigation.

And the craziness didn’t end with myocarditis. The pattern repeated with strokes, too. In late 2022, the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink flagged a signal for ischemic stroke in seniors following the bivalent booster. The agency said other datasets did not confirm it, and the signal later faded, and it kept recommending boosters for everyone over 65. Was the signal just noise, as they claimed? Maybe so. But the same agency had just spent a year and a half burying a myocarditis signal, so it makes sense not to take their all-clear on faith and to notice that they never paused the booster for seniors while they investigated.

The government’s own record and well-documented concealment ends here. Why the product was allowed to hurt people is a different question, and the agencies that sat on the signal have never answered it. Unfortunately, we cannot look to the agencies mandated to protect us for any compelling work on this question. That work has been performed by independent physicians and scientists. A case in point is the pseudonymous author A Midwestern Doctor, who, over the years, has put together a mechanistic argument well worth one’s attention.

He maintains that the mRNA jab was never just one vaccine. Instead, it was three risky bets stacked on top of each other. And at each bet, the faster, more potent choice beat out the safer choice. The antigen, that part of the virus the vaccine is meant to have your body target, was the first bet. Big Pharma put their money on the spike protein and then set to engineer the body to make it in bulk, a notable choice given the protein’s own toxicity.

The second bet was the method of how to get the spike protein where they wanted it to go. The delivery system had to successfully transport the delicate mRNA into the cells, so they encased it in lipid nanoparticles, or tiny fat bubbles. LNPs do what they are made to do, but in the process of getting through the cell membranes, they cause serious damage.

A Midwestern Doctor argues that the third bet is where the real, enduring harm lies. His point is this: under normal circumstances, mRNA is broken down by the body in a matter of days. Not wanting the product in the vial to be destroyed prematurely, the makers constructed it with N1-methylpseudouridine, a synthetic of no natural occurrence. The human body has a remarkable way of cleaning up after itself, but it does not know what to make of this ingredient. In fact, the N1-methylpseudouridine proved too effective. Rather than doing its work and fading, the mRNA hung around, continuing to tell the body to churn out spike protein well past the point it should have stopped. The result was a spike protein factory inside of a jabbed body that could not be put out of commission.

Getting to the bottom of this nightmare matters because of where the mRNA platform came from. As we’ve reported, Moderna spent more than a decade developing mRNA for DARPA before the pandemic ever arrived, under a program aimed squarely at ‘engineered biological threats.’ Clearly, this platform was not a folk remedy improvised for a public health emergency. Not by a long shot. Instead, it was a long-gestating, military-adjacent platform, with funding from Bill Gates and other agencies as well, pushed to market at warp speed, with significant safety tradeoffs made quietly and the serious consequences hidden afterward. Whether this tyrannical experience has been reckless profiteering or something more sinister, the documented behavior is the same, and speaks volumes. They knew, they drafted the warning, showed it to Big Pharma, and then filed it away, telling those that were injured for years that their symptoms were imaginary. We must stop pretending the government didn’t know.

Generic avatar

Tracy Beanz & Michelle Edwards

Tracy Beanz is an investigative journalist, Editor-in-Chief of UncoverDC, and host of the daily With Beanz podcast. She gained recognition for her in-depth coverage of the COVID-19 crisis, breaking major stories on the virus’s origin, timeline, and the bureaucratic corruption surrounding early treatment and the mRNA vaccine rollout. Tracy is also widely known for reporting on Murthy v. Missouri (Formerly Missouri v. Biden), a landmark free speech case challenging government-imposed censorship of doctors and others who presented alternative viewpoints during the pandemic.