Episode 491: MEASLES BLAME GAME, FAUCI LAWYERS UP & THE CLANCY PHARMA CONNECTION
Comments
Episode Segments
Episode 491: MEASLES BLAME GAME, FAUCI LAWYERS UP & THE CLANCY PHARMA CONNECTION
A battle erupts between RFK Jr. and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro over two “measles-associated” deaths, vaccine misinformation, and the use of abortion-derived fetal cell lines in MMR production.
Jefferey Jaxen investigates Merck’s claim that fulfilling President Trump’s order to split the MMR vaccine could take up to a decade. Plus, Fauci launches a legal defense fund as scrutiny of the COVID lab-leak cover-up intensifies.
As closing arguments conclude in the Lindsay Clancy trial, Del sits down with board-certified clinical psychologist Dr. Roger McFillin to examine Clancy’s psychiatric-drug history and ask whether the pharmaceutical industry belongs on trial, too.
Then, Del checks in with MAPS President Dr. James Neuenschwander about a MAPS physician’s appointment to the NIH and the upcoming MAPS conference.
Guests: Aaron Siri, Esq., James Neuenschwander, M.D., Roger K. McFillin, Psy.D., ABPP
Airdate: August 27, 2026
Explore
The penalties for crimes should be the same (in duration) for those with an insanity defense vs. a person deemed evil (often because their defense was not as robust). If you kill someone, the duration of the penalty should be the same.|
However, it you commit that offence under duress of “post partem” issues, we can make your incarceration different, but your culpability and duration of sentence should be the same. The psychological issues don’t dismiss that the person is guilty, but they do indicate that the incarceration or treatment should be different. We have to punish the crime on the individual, but we have to be open to recovery. Justice needs to be justice in all cases, if the penalty should be different (not less or more, but different), I think most can digest that. You took the drugs, the sign off included that you acknowledged the side effects. If you were misled, then yes, back on the doctor. So, even if in the end, someone is not held culpable, they should be held still a danger, if approved by a jury. Then the perpetrator can be taken off the streets.
I’m speaking as a clinical psychologist for almost 50 years in sharing my experience of psychiatrists and primary care physicians typically prescribing psychotropic drugs (this term is being used intentionally) sans thorough evaluation (which would identify underlying psychological dynamics and explore lifestyle factors). These physicians tell patients they have neurological “chemical imbalance”, increase dosage and prescribe additional drugs when the original drugs amplify symptoms for which they were prescribed, fail to provide informed consent, and fail to recognize their own iatrogenic treatment. Patients decompensate when attempting to get off psychiatric drugs by themselves, and hence become patients for life. Only recently (2026) has the MAHA Mental Health Summit included presentation of deprescription, and only a few integrative physicians have experience in this realm. To my knowledge Secretary Kennedy is the first individual to promote study of helping patients titrate off psychotropic meds.
Thank you, Del and Dr. McFillin for your very significant discussion that I’ve attempted to have for nearly 50 years!