DR. ROBERT MALONE EXPOSES INCOMPLETE DATA BEHIND RSV VOTE
Comments
Dr. Robert Malone opens up about his controversial “yes” vote on the RSV monoclonal antibody recently added to vaccine schedule for newborns and pregnant women as a member serving on the newly restructured Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the CDC. He admits that he regrets the decision after realizing the committee was handed incomplete information and pushed to move too quickly., Malone stresses that both HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and President Trump are backing efforts to challenge entrenched interests and reevaluate the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Calling for patience, Malone says they have three and a half years to take on one of the biggest industries in the world and realign policy with the needs of parents and children.
AIR DATE: August 28, 2025
Explore
This is the final straw for my sponsorship of ICAN. Robert Malone is a despicable and obvious Manchurian. He lies constantly and is transparently evil! I’ve ended my sponsorship today because you continue to gatekeep for Kennedy and his HHS Sec COVID emergency declaration responsibilites that continue to maim and murder all under your watch.
IMO the court cases they raise make it important to continue to support ICAN. While I have low regard for Malone, I do think it’s important to keep on top of what all those in the health freedom movement say, including the likes of Malone, a person whose information I take with caution.
Agree with you why would he vote yes’ without having all the information. I have never trusted him but was being open minded till I heard this.
Throughout this entire video Dr Malone explains why there was NOT scientific support for voting yes and he does not provide any valid reasoning for why he voted yes. He shirks his responsibility and accountability for the role he was asked to do. He is repeatedly pushing off the explanation for his vote as “they didn’t give us all the data”. He essentially voted the same way all prior members did… he rubber stamped it despite having reservations and seeing that the treatment group was worse off than the placebo group.
Like a court case, it should be rejected if there is reasonable doubt. I watched Malone in Sen. Johnson’s hearings. He sits there like the big expert, but never says anything that might raise controversy, but jumps in to correct or “better explain” the statements of others. He has great expertise, there is no doubt, but despite his acceptance into the health freedom community, his (at best) thin skin makes him ready to strike if crossed.
Agree
Despite his great expertise, I will never forget Malone’s “mass formation psychosis,” which puts the blame on people who were subjected to years of deliberate lies and manipulation. I will always take what he says with reservation, particularly after reading the actual court documents in the suit against Breggin. If he has apologized, I haven’t heard it and would be happy to stand corrected.