I am inclined to agree will Del that Abbott is trying to make a point (bussing, etc.) and to reduce illegal immigrant crossing. I know that Abbott is also a WEF ‘graduate’ but some graduates have ‘recanted.’ I am impressed with Yon’s work and experience and what he brings to light but not everyone gets everything right or interprets everything right all the time
I feel compassion for the bulk of the immigrants who are putting themselves in danger because of the encouragement they are getting about getting into the USA from several sources.
If the IOM thinks the USA is so great why doesn’t it instead encourage the countries these people came from to make their own countries, rich in human and other resources, beautiful places to live and prosper? A rationale for easing immigration rules would be massive climate-caused inhabitable areas. The IOM can’t be working from this theory. (Yes, I recognize human-influenced climate changed and CO2 increase. No I do not believe the WEF version of this. No, I do not support the WEF insanity and opportunistic fear-mongering and so-called solutions. People who blindly embrace CO2 increase haven’t read the science even though some of them are ‘scientists.’ There are many examples I could use but one is that cassava, 1/3 of all tropical carbs, when grown in a high CO2 environment (greenhouse), instead of creating its usual yam-sized tubers produces tiny shriveled tubers AND its leaves become poisonous. One of many varieties of untoward effects of high CO2. Kerry is not always wrong: we (and the life-forms we depend on) did not evolve to live in a high CO2 environment.