By Jefferey Jaxen
On May 4th, 2020 as part of a documentary series called Plandemic, investigative filmmaker Mikki Willis released an interview featuring science whistleblower Dr. Judy Mikovits. The interview received fierce backlash and heavy-handed censorship for what the corporate media declared “dangerous conspiracy theories.”
Plandemic 2 now goes deeper, beyond Dr. Mikovits, into conflicts of interest surrounding the coronavirus by top health bodies.
National Intelligence Analyst and Founder of IQ100, David E. Martin, PHD made the discovery that in 1999, patents for the coronavirus started showing up. Martin stated, “In 2003 the [U.S.] Centers for Disease Control saw the possibility of a gold strike” as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), a coronavirus, swept through China and then Hong Kong.
Martin states that the CDC, through patent applications, “…made sure that they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, to its detection and all of the measurement of it.”
By receiving the patents ultimately constraining anyone from working with the coronavirus, Martin claims that the CDC and a host of other individuals, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, had “the means, the motive, and…monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to profit.”
The first vaccine for COVID-19 to begin trials in the United States is mRNA-1273. This experimental vaccine was developed by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), along with a biotech company, Moderna Inc.
Recently, the non-profit group the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) confirmed that officials within the NIH who are working to develop a vaccine for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) stand to personally earn millions of dollars from sales of this vaccine.
In short, individuals within Dr. Fauci’s NIAID, and their heirs, will each potentially earn millions of dollars personally from sales of mRNA-1273 and NIAID also stands to earn millions annually from the sale of this vaccine.
Why is this information presented in the Plandemic documentary series just now seeing possible mainstream adaption? The film dives into the internet’s self-proclaimed ‘fact checkers’ as drivers of online ‘facts.’ Continually cited by corporate media outlets when debunking stories and justifying censorship, evidence shows that most ‘fact checking’ outlets like Wikipedia, Snopes, Politifact and others are neither independent nor factual serving more to derail inconvenient facts that run counter to narratives put forth by government bodies.
On Monday, the non-profit group Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Federal Court charging Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and three fact-checking outfits with censoring truthful public health posts and for fraudulently misrepresenting and defaming CHD. Facebook has acknowledged that it coordinates its censorship campaign with the WHO and the CDC.
Plandemic 2 lays out a desperate case for rampant conflicts of interest within national and global health bodies. The refusal to implant anti-trust laws and a complacent mechanism of paying fines for crimes and harms as a cost of doing business has permeated the pharmaceutical-industrial complex – the cost to the lives of everyday people has been incalculable.
Willis, refused by corporate media the ability to add balance to waves of one-side hit pieces, commented about his film and the interview with Dr. Mikovits saying, “As a father and a veteran media producer, there is no way I would release harmful information into the world during a moment as vulnerable as now. I had know Dr. Judy for two years before fmilming her interview. I read her book and thoroughly researched and vetted her story. After interviewing her legal team, former colleagues, and people who have known her for decades, one thing I can say without a question is Judy Mikovits is one of the most honest, caring and courageous women I’ve ever known.”