Episode 453: EXPOSING THE MOTIVE
Comments
Episode Segments
Episode 453: EXPOSING THE MOTIVE
Today on The HighWire, Del reveals why the CDC quietly changed its vaccines-autism page — now stating the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not evidence-based. Jefferey Jaxen covers the FDA’s bombshell disclosure that the COVID shot has killed at least 10 children, Europe’s rejection of Bovaer cow feed, and why flaws in a new Cochrane HPV study undermine claims it prevents cervical cancer. Then, Carrie Bigford (Texans for Vaccine Choice) shares tools she developed to help advocates confidently navigate vaccine discussions. We’ll check in live on the ACIP meeting, plus major news — ICAN will present to ACIP tomorrow at 9:30 AM ET. Del also sits down with Dr. Bob Sears to discuss MAHA leadership and the ACIP Hepatitis B vote.
Guests: Carrie Bigford, Dr. Bob Sears
AIR DATE: December 4, 2025
Explore
Let us get real here. I stopped watching briefly just to comment here at the government owing 20 trillion.
That is for just one type of vaccine injury. There are plenty more that effects health and thinking. like diabetes, bipolar, thyroid, serious autoimmune problems; just to name a few.
Yet, all the government has to do is pass some legislation and they are not going to pay out. Simple enough..
At the end of all things the human race is going to wish it was just about some human invention that represents work and
labor. Ohhh, they are going to wish there was some one left to actually do the work and labor.
These geniuses are really short sighted, I mean really short sighted.
Cause it is going to cost us civilization. No skills or health no skills for keeping the electric on or water on, just to name only two. .
I guess that is why they are hoping for AI and robots. What Bill Gates is going to to keep that going by himself.
Thank you Del, Aaron and your team for the important work that you do!
Farrr more 10 children died from duh Covid $hotz, we saw more than just those in sports, just on the news…
Regarding Ms. Bigford’s presentation, if only 7% of what moves the person with whom you’re having a dialogue, what does that say about online, text-only interactions? I suppose you can convey some empathy with your words, but it sounds like changing anybody’s mind in a comment section of a website is always going to be very, very tough sledding (which incidentally has been my experience).
Whoops, I mean, if only 7% of what moves the needle, so to speak, is your choice of words, what does that say about online interactions.