From Polio to COVID: 3 Times Protecting the Vaccine Program Took Priority Over Acknowledging Widespread Harms

Are vaccines ‘safe and effective’? Before the pandemic, that question was considered controversial. Now the public rejection of liability-free, injectable product lines is being seen for what the experiment always was.

From inhuman vaccine mandates to purposely broken safety monitoring and injury compensation systems, many are now awake to the crimes and fraud committed during the pandemic to artificially prop up an unsustainable market and inject millions.

An accurate accounting of history shows that this isn’t the first time officials colluded and conspired to conceal mass human damage.

POLIO

During America’s polio response, the race to develop a vaccine mirrored the COVID pandemic. With archaic methods in the infancy of vaccinology, the polio response was more public relations than actual science.

Labs raced to procure Dr. Jonas Salk’s inactivated (or killed) virus polio vaccine. Much like the COVID vaccine development, the quality control tests of the first-run models were abandoned once mass production commenced. The result was officially deemed ‘The Cutter Incident,’ in which it was revealed that Cutter Labs was shipping out live polio vaccine that went into the arms of untold numbers of Americans.

The book The Cutter Incident writes:

“In the end, at least 220,000 people were infected with live polio virus contained in Cutter’s vaccine; 70,000 developed muscle weakness, 164 were severely paralyzed, and 10 were killed.”

These numbers were likely an underestimate.

Cutter Labs took the hit as a limited hangout to serve as damage control, but in reality several top labs were shipping out live polio virus in their vaccines because the standardized process at the time used formaldehyde to kill the virus, but inactivation was incomplete.

NIH scientist whistleblower Bernice Eddy had warned about paralysis in monkeys given Cutter material and raised concerns that were ignored, leading to her reassignment to hide the issue.

Tennessee Congressman Percy Priest at the time stated:

“In the previous year (1955) many responsible persons had felt that the public should be spared the ordeal of ‘knowledge about controversy.’ If word ever got out that the Public Health Service had actually done something damaging to the health of the American people, the consequences would be terrible…We felt that no lasting good could come to science or the public if the Public Health Services were discredited.”

Human damage ignored and never fully accounted for or corrected in the name of protecting ‘science’ and ‘public health.’

AUTISM

It becomes clear that if one searches for sound safety science regarding the longstanding vaccine-autism debate, there actually is little to none available to satisfy the official government and legacy media’s talking point refuting the connection.

Informed Consent Action Network sued the CDC in federal court to produce the science to back the agency’s claim that “vaccines do not cause autism.” The CDC was unable to produce any studies or reviews to support the claim that vaccines injected into babies – DTaP, Hep B, Hib, PCV13, and IPV – do not cause autism.

Despite the long-growing concern about the lack of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies and proper safety science regarding autism, the public is left in the dark and while those within the medical establishment seem to openly know the secret.

Here’s the legacy media’s go-to expert Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia:

Here’s Kathryn M. Edwards, MD widely considered ‘The Godmother’ of vaccine science under oath being deposed by ICAN’s Aaron Siri, Esq.:

The CDC’s latest autism rates are 1 in 31 children.

COVID

During the failed Covid pandemic response, several crimes were committed, still to be accounted for, by public health officials at the time.

Under direct pressure from White House Digital Strategy director Rob Flaherty, March 2021 emails to Facebook (produced in the Missouri v. Biden / Murthy v. Missouri discovery) showed the company reassuring the White House that they were censoring “often-true content” that “does not contain actionable misinformation” but was “discouraging vaccines.”

The Virality Project (Stanford Internet Observatory and partners, in routine contact with the CDC, Surgeon General’s office, and CISA) used the same justification in writing.

Emails released in the Twitter Files asked platforms whether they wanted reports on “true content which might promote vaccine hesitancy,” including “true stories of vaccine side effects” and “celebrity deaths after vaccine,” and told Twitter that “true stories that could fuel hesitancy” should be treated as “Standard Vaccine Misinformation on Your Platform.”

The project’s own public description stated its purpose was to detect and mitigate narratives that could “undermine the public’s confidence” in COVID-19 vaccines. That language appears in both the internal notifications and the project’s announced mission.

We all lived through the results of these efforts to reduce ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and are still piecing together the harms and damage caused as officials coordinated the shutdown of social media to muzzle evidence of injury and deaths from the experimental Covid vaccines as they were rolled out.

Who decides how much harm the public can endure at the hands of an archaic vaccine paradigm with poor safety science? With a historical track record of regular failures many wonder when the public will finally be done with mandated vaccine schedules foisted upon our families.