The latest Rasmussen poll speaks volumes. A major flashing warning light for public health officials and political leadership. Are they paying attention? And more importantly, will they act?

Rasmussen polls are pulse checks – real-time snapshots of public sentiment and mood on key topics.

The recent Rasmussen report reveals:

-26% say they had minor side effects from the COVID-19 shot

-10% reported major side effects from the vaccine

-46% believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths

Under Kennedy’s leadership at HHS, once authoritarian COVID shot mandates have been backed off to ‘individual-based decision-making,’ but is that enough? It’s clear the current public health apparatus wants out of all aspects of the Biden administration’s COVID train wreck.

Given the mounting data and science pointing to harms, many believe the government should be doing more – namely, removing the COVID shot from the market.

At the same time, The Telegraph is reporting the following:

The story was created thanks to the legal action of the independent, non-profit, non-affiliated group UsForThemUK, along with diagnostic pathologist Dr. Clare Craig, who engaged in a 2-year battle to get public transparency of the general COVID vaccine and mortality data…data that was freely shared with pharmaceutical companies but withheld from the public.

The group lost its legal fight, but a key admission was revealed to the public as the Telegraph writes:

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to the “distress or anger” of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.

Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.

The Telegraph then describes a behind-the-scenes moment, writing:

“UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments, including that publishing the data “could lead to misinformation” that would “have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake” in the public.”

In America, the CDC has just updated its “Vaccine Safety’ page, creating massive public buzz showing an evolution in both science and a willingness to be truthful towards the public.

Among the new admissions, the CDC website now states:

“Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism. However, this statement has historically been disseminated by the CDC and other federal health agencies within HHS to prevent vaccine hesitancy.”

Together, both the UKHSA and CDC’s new statements show there has been, and still is, a lockstep coordination to purposely censor information from the public when it comes to injectable pharmaceutical product lines.

Governments are desperate to avoid the COVID vaccine injury conversation, eager to avoid a full-blown public health revolt on unknown consequences (already happening in large sections of the population)

The American COVID vaccine space is still a dismal public relations nightmare. The PREP Act, keeping the pandemic’s unnecessary actions in effect, blocks any hope of proper compensation for the critical mass of Americans who have experienced injuries from the mandated, failed shot.

Meanwhile, the ‘science is not political’ crowd spawned an East and West Coast Alliances coalition of all blue Democrat-run states, representing the high-water mark of hypocrisy and groupthink. Banding together for the purpose of ignoring the facts and evidence to push the COVID shot on infants and healthy people, sans pandemic emergency.

The bizarre and self-defeatist move of refusing to acknowledge any new science since 2020 on the mounting dangers of the COVID shot – the alliances are not only a danger to public health but to the credibility of the very institutions they claim to be standing for – a perfect inversion.

The harms of the COVID shot are still a real concern for the American public. Ignoring these concerns or attempting to soft-sell solutions that bypass real help for the injured will not make this flashing red light any dimmer.

Jefferey Jaxen

Jefferey Jaxen is an investigative journalist and researcher, best known for his weekly segment The Jaxen Report on The HighWire. With a sharp eye for detail and a talent for clear, compelling storytelling, he has exposed major issues in medicine, science, and public health policy, earning recognition as a trusted voice in independent journalism.