GOOD QUESTIONS, TERRIBLE ANSWERS
Comments
POSTED: June 28, 2022
Explore
-
RASH OF NEW BILLS SIGNAL PARENTAL RIGHTS WAR
American families have been in a battle to protect their children from an overreaching public health apparatus for years. Now, backlash is growing against bills targeting parental rights, in the form of multiple bills written to protect and affirm parental choice.
#ParentalConsent #Choice #MedicalFreedom
-
ICAN LEGAL WIN SECURES CHOICE, SETS PRECEDENT
ICAN’s latest legal win put Del up against an old foe in Richard Pan, the former CA Senator secretly behind the push for San Diego Unified School District’s attempt to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine. Hear the details of the legal precedent the win sets and how Pan failed to cover up the loss.
#RichardPan #VaccineMandates #SDISD #ICAN
-
DID AMERICA BLOW UP THE NORD STREAM PIPELINE?
A colossal geopolitical story with dire implications for the food chain, farmers, Europeans trying to heat their homes and provocations of a major escalation towards a war with global superpowers. American journalist Seymour Hersh explains why he believes America sabotaged the Nord Stream pipeline.
#Biden #NordStream #EnergyBills
-
Episode 308: THE CHEMICAL TRAIL
Today we are following The Chemical Trail: Fluoride Lawsuit Exposes Apparent Government Official Hiding Data; Big Win in Maryland; Gates-Funded Study Shows Two Years Later, Natural Immunity Still Better Than Vaccine. Why?; Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Attacked By The U.S.?; Tackling the Controversial Issue of Chemtrails; ICAN wins in CA Lawsuit Prohibiting Any Vaccine Mandates, Setting Precedent
Guests: Derrick Broze, Dane Wigington
#FluorideLawsuit #NaturalImmunity #ICANLegal #AaronSiri
-
TACKLING THE CHEMTRAIL CONTROVERSY
Del tackles the taboo topic with Chemtrails and weather modification, questioning Lead Researcher for ‘GeoEngineering Watch,’ Dane Wigington, on his findings from US Patents, military whistleblowers, and even lab-studied samples from cloud seeding. Is it a global conspiracy?
#TheDimming #ChemTrails #GeoEngineering #WeatherModification
-
THE DEADLY TOXIN LURKING IN YOUR WATER
Years of peer-reviewed studies on the dangers of human exposure to fluoride should be enough to prove it isn’t a conspiracy. Activist and investigative journalist, Derrick Broze, describes the nearly decade long legal battle between multiple watchdog groups and the EPA to release the National Toxicology Program’s review that could blow the lid off serious dangers of fluoride toxicity in U.S. drinking water.
#DerrickBroze #Fluoride #ConspiracyTheory
-
DESPITE $11 TRILLION FOR COVID, GOV’T PROGRAM HAS PAID $0 TO COVID VACCINE-INJURED
It is perhaps the biggest untold medical story involving the government of our time. American’s have nowhere to turn if they get injured or die after receiving a COVID vaccine. FOIA emails reveal a countermeasures compensation program unwilling to safeguard, or even compensate, injured vaccine recipients.
#VaccineInjured #COVID #CICP
-
NATURAL IMMUNITY TO COVID PROVEN SUPERIOR TO VACCINE IMMUNITY
As masks, lockdowns, and COVID shots are being seen for how truly ineffective they each were, it’s natural immunity’s turn to be recognized after years of censorship. As legacy media races to act like they are breaking a new story, many know all along the power of natural immunity.
#NaturalImmunity #BillMaher
-
TOP VACCINOLOGIST: CLINICAL TRIALS FAIL TO SUPPORT CLAIM ‘VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM’
Informed Consent Action Network (icandecide.org) funded Lead Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., to depose and later cross-examine world-leading Vaccinologist, Dr. Kathyrn Edwards in 2020. Within the hours-long cross-examination she gave a shocking answer to the question; “Do childhood vaccine trials support the CDC’s claim that vaccines do not cause autism?” Regardless of your stance on the issue of Vaccines and Autism, her answer is a must-see.
#EdwardsDeposition #GodmotherOfVaccines #VaccinesAndAutism #UntilProvenOtherwise
#ICANlegal
POSTED: January 6, 2023
Outference – a critical (not rhetorical) argument which bases its inference or conclusions upon cultivated ignorance and the resulting lack of information, rather than the presence of sound information. More than simply an appeal to ignorance, this ‘lack’ of information is specifically engineered to produce specious conclusion in the first place. This type of argument gets stronger and stronger the less and less critical information one holds. This is a warning flag of agenda or political shenanigans at play.
One should notice that the debunker (aka: Lord Fauci) most often ends this process with two implicit (and often explicit) scientific claims, issuing such offenses inside the masquerade of a staid and erudite demeanor:
“I am the science!”
1. That the subject and the one who approaches that subject as an open-minded researcher, are both now discredited scientifically (debunked), and
2. The debunker themself bears the qualifications necessary to represent the scientific method, scientific consensus, critical thinking, skepticism, and science itself.
Lord Fauci has NEVER faced an honest debate and never will. He knows better.
No sound from 1:37-3:47 here. 🙁