GOOD QUESTIONS, TERRIBLE ANSWERS
Comments
POSTED: June 28, 2022
Explore
-
IS ALZHEIMER’S LINKED TO ALUMINUM EXPOSURE?
Dr. Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, known as “Mr. Aluminum” for his expertise on environmental aluminum, thinks he has the answer. Professor Exley discusses the shocking results of a study he conducted, which found accumulations of aluminum in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s.
#ChrisExley #MrAluminum #AgeOfAluminum #NoAluminumNoAlzheimers
-
DO MAMMALS HAVE ANY HISTORY OF CONTACT WITH ALUMINUM?
Dr. Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB (AKA “Mr. Aluminum”), explains why aluminum is not an essential metal for humans, and has only come in contact with mammals in the last century.
#ChrisExley #MrAluminum #AgeOfAluminum
-
IS ALUMINUM EXPOSURE LINKED TO AUTISM?
Dr. Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, chemist and expert in the field of aluminum,
discusses his in-depth studies on the undeniable link between aluminum exposure and autism.
#ChrisExley #MrAluminum #AgeOfAluminum #Autism
-
HOW MANY ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED IN THE CDC’S ‘V-SAFE’ REPORTING APP?
ICAN Lead Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq. discusses the astounding number of reports of adverse events following a COVID-19 vaccine, via data from the CDC’s v-safe app, which was produced to ICAN after suing CDC to release the data. Mr. Siri uses ICAN’s user-friendly v-safe dashboard available at icandecide.org, to break down the troubling information.
#ICANVsafeDashboard #ICAN #Vsafe #CDC #AaronSiri
-
HOW LONG DOES RNA FROM THE COVID VACCINE STAY IN YOUR BODY?
Co-inventor of mRNA technology, Robert Malone, MD, breaks down how long the modified molecule in the mRNA stays in the body, and the amount of spike protein it produces compared to that in someone naturally infected.
#RobertMalone #mRNA
-
WHY WAS mRNA TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED?
Physician and Biochemist, Robert Malone, MD, discusses the intent behind the creation of mRNA technology he helped develop and how it was parlayed into COVID-19 vaccines.
#RobertMaloneMD #mRNA
-
WHAT IS THE TROUBLE WITH THE MONKEYPOX VACCINE?
Epidemiologist and cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, explains the serious issues with the JYNNEOS vaccine used for Monkeypox.
-
WHY ARE MOST CHILDREN AND ADULTS SAFE FROM COVID?
World-renowned virologist, Geert Vanden Bossche, explains how innate antibodies differ from naturally acquired antibodies, thereby protecting children and healthy adults from developing serious disease associated with Covid-19.
Get the Facts:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02139/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00872/full
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR2WENPwM1tZfnM7lNrFNAT6zkdxGieo1i9Ay5NsCEzE6MSDoOOk8qlxGrU%20https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR2WENPwM1tZfnM7lNrFNAT6zkdxGieo1i9Ay5NsCEzE6MSDoOOk8qlxGrU
#GetFactsinated #GVB #InnateAntibodies #Covid19
-
ARE VACCINATED KIDS HEALTHIER THAN THE UNVACCINATED?
Integrative Pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas, breaks down the eye-opening results from his extensive, peer-reviewed, ten-year study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids in his pediatric practice.
Get the Facts: ‘Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination’
https://circleofmamas.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Paul-Thomas-Weiler.pdf
**Even after vigorous peer-review and publication, Dr. Thomas’ study was retracted due to the nature of the conclusion.
#DrPaulThomas #VaxxedVsUnVaxxed #VaxUnvax #DoTheStudy
Outference – a critical (not rhetorical) argument which bases its inference or conclusions upon cultivated ignorance and the resulting lack of information, rather than the presence of sound information. More than simply an appeal to ignorance, this ‘lack’ of information is specifically engineered to produce specious conclusion in the first place. This type of argument gets stronger and stronger the less and less critical information one holds. This is a warning flag of agenda or political shenanigans at play.
One should notice that the debunker (aka: Lord Fauci) most often ends this process with two implicit (and often explicit) scientific claims, issuing such offenses inside the masquerade of a staid and erudite demeanor:
“I am the science!”
1. That the subject and the one who approaches that subject as an open-minded researcher, are both now discredited scientifically (debunked), and
2. The debunker themself bears the qualifications necessary to represent the scientific method, scientific consensus, critical thinking, skepticism, and science itself.
Lord Fauci has NEVER faced an honest debate and never will. He knows better.
No sound from 1:37-3:47 here. 🙁